

![]() |
Click here for: |
Click here for: |
![]() |
Dr Llopart joined Hipra in 1992 and became a member of
the Veterinarian Pig Technical Service Department.
Throughout Hipra he
had the excellent opportunity to travel worldwide in all the continents, trying
to assess producers as much as he could, but more importantly to understand
different production systems and disease scenarios which helped very much to
develop his knowledge as a pig vet.
Recently, since last year, he’s coordinating the team of vets belonging to Pig
Business Unit (encharged of both Marketing and Technical Pig Department of
Hipra).
Title: "Understanding infections’ dynamics to control PRDC problematic
farms"
Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex (PRDC) is of major concern in industrial
pig farming since is still responsible for major productive losses in many farms
worldwide. As a complex, 2 main components are playing a very important role on
the expression of the PRDC. One component is what we could call the
"environmental component", which refers to the ventilation, housing,
temperature, management, stock density, genetics, immunological status of the
host, feeding system, etc. and the other component is what we could call the
"pathogenic component", which refers tot the different virus or bacteria
involved. About the "pathogenic component" of the complex, Porcine Respiratory
and Reproductive Virus (PRRSV) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhyo) has been
demonstrated to play a major role on the PRDC, in combination with other viruses
(Swine Influenza virus (SIV), Aujeszky’s Disease virus (ADV) or bacteria
(Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Haemophilus parasuis, Pasteurella multocida,
etc). However, the expression of the disease into a farm is a balanced situation
between these two components.
Even though two farms could present similar "pathogenic component" (infected
with the same pathogens) and also similar "environmental component"(same
genetic, same feeding, same technical management), the mortality between the two
farms could be drastically different. One of the main reasons for such
differences is due to the infections dynamics curve of each one of the pathogens
infecting the two farms are different, and therefore, the co-infection periods
between pathogens also keeps changing. The infection dynamic curve of a given
pathogen keeps changing throughout the time, being necessary to monitor it at
least once a year to check the evolution. Therefore, the use of serology, and
particularly, the use of herd-profiles (serumprofiles or PCR-profiles) in PRDC
problematic farms has became an very useful tool to monitor the dynamic of
infection of each one of the pathogens involved and to evaluate the dynamics of
co-infections between pathogens.
In this presentation, the practical case exposed, consists on a longitudinal
herd-profile and PRC-profile carried out in a 4000 sow farrow-to-finish farm
with high mortalities in their post-weaning and fattening units. Results showed
the different dynamic of infection for each pathogen. However, knowing the
dynamics of infection of each pathogen was not enough to decide what strategy
had to be implemented to improve mortality in this particular farm. What it
works in a farm, not necessarily have to work in another farm to reduce
mortality. It was necessary to study the dynamic of co-infections between
pathogens by using a Co-infection Dynamic Table. Evaluating what co-infections
were overlapping along the live of the pigs during nursery and fattening period,
became much easier to understand which pathogens were directly involved with the
mortality, becoming easier to decide what technical actions had to be
implemented first in the farm.