NEWS

Boar taint vaccination: no impact on behaviour

//18 Feb 2010
The behaviour of male pigs, vaccinated against boar taint, does not create extra problems in the fattening period, when compared to surgically castrated pigs.

The study into fattenening pigs was published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science.


In the Austrian/German research, carried out by scientists from the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, the University of Leipzig, a veterinary practice and Pfizer Animal Health, the male vaccinated pigs were housed in single sex groups of 12 individuals – and their behaviour was compared to conventionally castrated pigs, without the use of anaesthetics.


The two-shot vaccine, containing a gonadotropin releasing factor (GnRF), suppresses the development of the hormones androsthenone and skatole, both identified as the major causes for the development of boar taint in pigs. The vaccine is produced and marketed as Improvac.


Data collection
Data collection took place in a commercial German fattening unit. Each treatment comprised eight groups of 12 pigs. Data on postures were scored from 24-hour videos recorded in every week of the fattening period (16 weeks) using scan sampling with five minute intervals.


Social behaviour was analysed in weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15 and 16 by continuous behaviour recording of focus animals in four blocks of two hours phased evenly during the day. Overall, during the whole fattening period, vaccinates were more active than surgical castrates, indicated by a higher proportion of pigs standing.


Significant decrease
Vaccinated animals showed a significant decrease in standing and an increase of sitting and lying after the second vaccination. No significant effects of treatment on the total number of agonistic interactions and on biting and fighting were found.


In the vaccinated group, the prevalence of aggressive behaviours decreased after the second vaccination, which was not found in the group with non-castrated animals during the same period.


Vaccinated animals showed a higher level of mounting behaviour compared with non-vaccinated animals, but on a very low level. Treatment had no effect on the prevalence of play behaviour and manipulating of penmates.


Related websites:
• Applied Animal Behaviour Science
• Pfizer Animal Health 
• University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
• University of Leipzig

Rating:
Click here to register for the free PigProgress newsletter

 
Pig production news Email newsletter Bloggers Events Photos Videos

Pig Production News by Region

African Pig Production News Asian Pig Production News European Pig Production News Oceanian Pig Production News American Pig Production News

Latest articles

JOIN IN - latest discussions

  • Expert talk: We need to move or we will be...
    Giuseppe Baricco wrote : Completely right, I also 100 % agree on the analysis and with the final suggestions: on the other side, the risk is : "as more as you give, as more they will... @ 22-05-2012 (16:33)
  • Where there is a will, there is a way: the...
    Dr Nikolaos Kotrotsios wrote : We are looking forward to enjoy your kind and good will, the excellent organization, the culture and natural environment beauty of your place, high level... @ 11-05-2012 (09:08)
  • RESEARCH: S. aureus in 16% of state fair...
    Ina wrote : ... and what is the problem? We know more than 6,000 different S.aureus-strains and we know about community-acquired MRSA und livestock associated... @ 08-05-2012 (15:13)

Free Newsletter

Free Newsletter

Register Now!

Up-to-date Pig Industry news with the
PigProgress.net's free newsletter

More information

Vincent ter Beek - editor Pig Progress discover the in's and out's of Pig Progress, follow Vincent ter Beek on twitter....
Created by: Twitter for Web