OpinionPig Management
Water: the hidden threat
Encouragingly, many papers have now been published on water. Farmers are also
providing sufficient drinkers, many with adjustable-height fixings (young pigs
grow upwards at about 2 cm per week and the tip of the drinker should raise the
pigs head 15 degrees from the backline so as to minimise spillage).
And
the way we water sows (badly – bite drinkers should be banned!) is receiving
attention at last. So things on the water front are looking up.
Water
hygiene
But there is one aspect of watering pigs which, because it is out
of sight, is also out of mind. This is water quality, which is taken far too
much for granted. 'Water hygiene' in other words.
Drinking water
contaminated by pathogens spread diseases like salmonellosis, ileitis, PRRS and
dysentery. The PRRS virus can survive in the pipes for ten days or more and the
enzootic pneumonia virus for a month.
Moreover, biofilms (an upmarket
name for 'slime') protects pathogens. One authority even claims 'it provides
coliform bacteria with up to a 3000-fold increase in
resistance'.
Smeared with slime
Remembering the sobering
experience on our own farm 40 years ago when the pigs got collywobbles we
couldn't cure – now, when inspecting a client's bowl or leaf drinker, I always
run my finger under the leaf. If it comes out smeared with slime, there will
probably be a little chap in there called Balantidium coli which can
cause digestive upset and mild looseness.
It is easily removed by
ensuring the pressure-washing lance gets behind the leaf, which blasts away the
slime and the bugs with it.
Some good advice on waterline
hygiene:
1. At every all-in/ all-out break disinfect the water lines
too. After removing sludge and debris from the header tanks, drain the system.
For non-drainable systems – see below.
2. Use a disinfectant which will
remove biofilm as well as killing pathogens. For example chlorine – often used
because it is cheap – will not remove biofilm to any appreciable extent .There
are several sanitants on the market that will – like Virkon 'S'
(DuPont).
3. Follow the instructions carefully as they vary between
manufacturers.
4. For example, Virkon 'S' used for 'terminal
disinfection' as it is called (as distinct from low-level continuous
disinfection, which is possible with some products) is used at 1:200 or 0.5%.
5. After disinfection flush the system. Leave for 30 minutes and
refill.
6. If you cannot drain the circuit, try to get it re-plumbed so
you can. If this is impractical, use the low level, high-dilution technique with
the pigs present.
7. But first, check carefully with the manufacturer
that his product is safe for pigs in situ. With Virkon 'S' the dilution
is 1:1000 (0.1%) during the period thought to be at risk. For longer routine
use, check with the manufacturer.
Why do I think terminal disinfection is
preferable to low-level, ongoing treatment?
Because I am sure biofilm
removal is more likely to be effective if carried out correctly every time the
barn is vacated.
Evidence
Also, on many units I am visiting at
present this isn’t done, as evidenced by two units I toured in Eastern Europe in
2007 – one where replumbing was in progress and another where the building was
being replaced, so I was able to have a good squint down the discarded,
recently-drained lines and insert my little finger.
Sticky 'gunge' was
evident, especially on the straight runs. Biofilm!
- Author: John Gadd
- Post a comment
Comments (5)
Thanks Marc. If your figures stand up to statistical scrutiny it shouldn`t be too difficult to promote?
Taking a better growth median level of 8.5% ( I assume across a 23 kg weight increase in the nursery period) and at a modest average daily gain averaging 250 g. then the treated pigs should leave the nursery at say, 30kg - around nine days sooner.
In my experience this sort of advantage could well go on to be doubled by slaughter weight, saving 4 to 5 euros of feed and 2 euros of overheads/pig.
So if your concept costs less than this per pig, then it scores on the basis of `if they like the post-weaning food and drink more - then they`ll eat more`. But if they don`t like the postweaning food (or if it is not well formulated / manufactured) then they may drink more to try to satisfy hunger that way and so eat less - which is a no-no.
Quality of water is very important but level intake after weaning could be also improved . We test a combination of electrolites , specific aroma and organic acids during 5 to 10 days after weaning in 2007 . We will observ 20% more water intake and 7 to 10% more increasing growing performences . This tecnic is not easy to promote but could be very efficient . KInd regards . Marc .
marc drillet celtilait ouest elevage France // Thursday 13 March 2008
John, thanks for creating awareness! Water is the most important nutrient we have, as it is used 2-6x more than feed. I have one other advice for farmers: try to drink the water of the pigs yourself. If you doubt doing that its time to seriously think about water hygiene!






