Digital Magazine! Read the latest edition
NOW online Click here

1526 views 2 comments

Does 'topping' help?

We all get this problem to a greater or lesser extent. Topping is the term given to removing pigs to a spare pen or even on to slaughter which are 5% to 10% ahead of the rest of their companions in a pen. Until I am persuaded otherwise, however, topping is not for me.

Topping is sometimes done about a week to ten days before slaughter when the pens are beginning to look distinctly crowded. As it seems to be a growing trend, I did some measurements in 2010 with co-operating farmers as I was unsure whether some forms of topping were a good idea.

The results encourage me to say… Topping or ‘selective removal’ is done for a variety of reasons:

(a) Removal to avoid overweights
Of course this is essential in order to avoid a penalty, but those chosen must be loaded straight on to the transporter and not kept mixed in one holding pen and thus handy for the early-morning collection.

(b) Moving fastest-growing pigs to a pen
Deliberately moving seven to ten days before estimated shipping date, some of the fastest-growing pigs to another pen – if such accomodation is available. Two producers constructed straw bale pens for this purpose but were careful not to be tempted to mix growers from different pens together to avoid skin damage from scrapping and antagonistic stress negating any improved growth rate. Topping adherents claim that the growth rate of the moved pigs improves by about 20 g/ day and of those left behind, due to more space and less competition, by up to 80 g/ day. This we found to be mostly correct.

(c) Conventional topping
Sending some of the fastest-growing to slaughter about a week sooner than normal. These pigs are shipped within the contract weight range but well towards its lower end. We tried this, and dependent on the terms of each farm’s contract, some 4.5 kg of potential deadweight return was sacrificed, costing €6.50 per pig – say €13 for the two biggest pigs sent on early from each increasingly overcrowded pen of 15 pigs. The remaining 13 benefited from more room and better access to feed – even ad-lib feed – but they still saved only half a day occupancy from their faster growth, plus €2 worth of food for the whole 13 pigs.

Yes, you can add to this a week’s food saved from those shipped early, but this only recouped one-third of the €13 lost income per pen from the meat they would have put on that final week.

The heavier you ship every pig as near to, but under, the contract overweight cut-off point, the better. On all three of these farms, topping carried out sensibly and well did have its physical benefits as claimed by the protagonists.

But it did not seem to pay
A classic example in that while published physical performance benefits way well be as found by researchers, when the econometrics are added in, then these favourable physical performance impressions may need to be questioned.

• Topping seems to work better when the pigs were overstocked – but they shouldn’t be in the first place! Surely it is cheaper not to overstock than to be forced into topping?

• Topping works better when there is spare accommodation available – which maybe should have been filled anyway, I admit!

So until I am persuaded otherwise, topping is not for me.


  • no-profile-image

    Meindert van den Hengel

    I strongly disagree with the author about what he calls topping. It is the perfect way to get the biggest number of pigs in a pen as close as possible to the maximum weight within the range a
    packer allows you to ship your pigs.The biggest effect is on the pigs that stay in the pen; because they get more (feeder) space they can gain significantly better in the last few weeks of the turn.W ithout topping the spread in weight will be far bigger and, more important, the genetic potential will not be fully utilised.

  • no-profile-image

    john gadd

    Thanks Meindeirt - I appreciate and accept your views and I also apologise for the delay in repying, but I am writing a new book. which doesn`t half deflect one from the daily round of replies and correspondence!!
    When results on a system, device, or product seem to be at variance I try to persuade clients to mount a trial with me to see what happens under farm conditions so as to hopefully `clear the air` a little, as I do not like giving advice unless I have done the job myself, or got some practical evidence on it.
    Where topping is concerned, I hope we did it as the protagonists advised. The physical performance improvements were there, but we were all mightily puzzled when the financial results between the topped and non-topped pens came in, to find there was little difference. 3 producers were involved
    I hope that some research establishment will investigate the value of topping further. You in the Netherlands do this sort of practical work so well - as do the Danes and Australians.

Or register to be able to comment.